Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Calcium (Ca) removed from the treatment solution and bound to bacterial pellet (mean ± sd; n = 4) after 60-min equilibrium with 1 or 10 mM Ca treatments.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Kinetics of calcium binding to S. mutans.

Ca concentration in the bacterial pellet as a function of time and of Ca concentration in the treatment solution (mean ± SD, n = 3).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Calcium binding at equilibrium.

Calcium concentration (μmol/g, mean ± sd, n = 3) in the bacterial pellet after 60 min of equilibrium of bacteria with PIPES buffer pH 7.0, containing 0 mM, 1 mM, 10 mM Ca in treatment solution or pretreated with 1 and re-equilibrated with 10 mM Ca.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Calcium binding maximum capacity (Cabmax) and equilibrium constant (Kd) calculated from the best-fit values of the binding curve kinetics as a function of Ca concentration in treatment solution (mean ± sd, n = 3).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Kinetics of calcium release from S. mutans.

Calcium concentration remaining in the bacterial pellets pretreated with 1 or 10 mM Ca as a function of time of exposure to a calcium-free (0 mM Ca) or a 1 mM Ca solution (mean ± SD, n = 3).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Calcium concentration in the bacterial pellet (Cab0) after pretreatment for 10 min with solutions containing 1 or 10 mM Ca, estimated binding at infinity (Cab∞) after equilibrium with calcium-free or 1 mM Ca solution and and half-life values calculated from kinetics release curve, for the different conditions tested (mean ± sd, n = 3).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Calcium release from S. mutans at decreasing pHs.

C concentration (mM, mean ± sd, n = 3), in treatment solution initially and after 10 min of equilibrium of bacteria with PIPES buffer pH 7.0, acetate buffer pH 5.0 and HCl pH 1.86 at proportion of 30% the treatment solution per bacterial weight (simulating the liquid-solid proportion in dental biofilms). Pretreatment conditions were 1 or 10 mM Ca. *Initial and final values differ statistically (paired t-test; p<0.05).

More »

Fig 4 Expand