Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Study design.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Subject characteristics of the TD children participating in part 1 of this study.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Subject information.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Intra-tester reliability results for the strength measurements, with the left side of the table representing the results when the absolute maximum was used and the right side of the table representing the results when an average of three trials was used.

F-values are printed in bold in case of a systematic error.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Intertester reliability results for the strength measurements, with the left side of the table representing the results when the absolute maximum was used and the right side of the table representing the results when an average of three trials was used.

F-values are printed in bold in case of a systematic error.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Reliability outcomes from the different RFD calculations for the plantar flexors, for both intra- and intertester repeatability.

The left side of the table gives the results when the absolute maximum was used, and the right side of the table are the results when an average of three trials was used. F-values are printed in bold in case of a systematic error.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Group differences determined with a Mann Whitney U test (median, interquartile range and p-value).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Spearman’s rho correlation coefficients between strength measurement outcomes and the gait parameters that differed from the TD children.

Moderate or higher correlations are printed in bold.

More »

Table 8 Expand