Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Model structure for the decision-tree used in the economic evaluation.

Note: MDCT, multidetector computed tomography; ECCM-MRI, Extracellular contrast media–enhanced MRI; GD-EOB-DTPA-MRI, Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Input probability for diagnostic accuracy for initial and subsequent imaging procedures.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Input probabilities for needing further information on non-HCC confirmed among patients with negative results at each imaging.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Input probabilities for subsequent diagnostic procedures arranged when further information was needed at each imaging.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Distribution of patients after initial imaging and all diagnostics.

Note: MDCT, multidetector computed tomography; ECCM-MRI, Extracellular contrast media–enhanced MRI; GD-EOB-DTPA-MRI, Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Total costs of diagnostic and treatment procedures depending on initial imaging.

Note: MDCT, multidetector computed tomography; ECCM-MRI, Extracellular contrast media–enhanced MRI; GD-EOB-DTPA-MRI, Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

One-way sensitivity analyses.

Note: MDCT, multidetector computed tomography; ECCM-MRI, Extracellular contrast media–enhanced MRI; GD-EOB-DTPA-MRI, Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

More »

Fig 4 Expand