Table 1.
Characteristics of the study population at baseline (n = 98).
Fig 1.
Behavior of epicardial fat (EF) during the study.
Table 2.
Comparison of demographic and laboratory parameters in the epicardial fat progressor and regressor groups.
Fig 2.
Comparison of the left ventricular mass index during the study between the epicardial fat progressor and regressor groups (2A –delta of LVMI and 2B –GEE model).
Table 3.
Comparison of cardiovascular parameters in the epicardial fat regressor and progressor groups.