Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Synonymies of SGSC according to previous reviews and geographical distributions reported.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Distribution of the Stenocereus griseus species complex (SGSC) taxa, as considered by Arreola-Nava [15].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Kriging interpolation of individual Q-matrix by each clustering method.

The first three maps columns (left to right) depict the interpolated assignment probability for each method (labeled in the heading) and K is the number of groups detected by each. Groups containing the same populations across methods (EGGs) are placed alongside and keep the same color hue, whereas the color gradient saturation represents higher probability: red = S. griseus-Mexico (here designated S. huastecorum); green = S. pruinosus and its subgroups (green shades in Geneland maps); blue = S. laevigatus and its subgroups (blue shades in Geneland maps), and dark gray = S. griseus. White bullets represent populations. EGGs populations are represented at the rightmost column by bullets which follow the color code before described.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Genetic clustering summary.

Color gradients represent BC belonging probability starting from the 75% threshold value, purple bars with green types bootstrap values are the three genetic barriers detected by Barrier, at the left the UPGMA dendrogram following the color code used in the BC.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Structural characters measured.

CLSL: central-left spine length, CRS: central-right spine, LCS: lower central spine, UCS: upper central spine, RCSL: radial c-homologous spine length, lower-case letters: radial spines (pairs represented by the same letter).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Pairwise comparisons of Ecological niche principal components and two-ways background tests.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

Niche suitability pairwise comparisons based on t-tests.

Different letters represent levels of significant differences.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Areolar morphometrics t-tests.

(A-D) areolar features lengths comparisons, (E-F) spines counts comparisons. Levels not connected by the same letter are significantly different.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Vegetative features of S. huastecorum.

(A) general aspect of S. huastecorum (H. Alvarado-Sizzo 350), (B) rib details (H. Alvarado-Sizzo 352), (C) typical young (upper) and mature (lower) areolas (H. Alvarado-Sizzo 245), (D) apex of a young branch. Credits: (A) I. Torres-García, (B-D) H. Alvarado-Sizzo.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

A newly opened S. huastecorum flower.

Lateral (A) and top (B) view, (C) longitudinal cut of the floral tube. (H. Alvarado-Sizzo 350). Credits: H. Alvarado-Sizzo. Scale bars = 1 cm.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Ripe fruit of S. huastecorum.

Falling areolas (A, upper) and longitudinal cut (A, lower), aspect of a reproductive branch with immature fruits (B), and focus stacking micrograph (4X) of a seed hilum-micropylar region (C) and lateral view(D). Credits: (A, B) H. Alvarado-Sizzo (C) A. González-Murillo & H. Alvarado-Sizzo. Scale bars (A) = 1 cm; (C, D) = 1 mm.

More »

Fig 9 Expand