Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary of the HRCT scoring system of the lavaged lung.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Total, differential cell and lymphocyte profiles in the BALF of control and MAC patients.

Cell pellets were counted in a hemocytometer, and Diff-Quik (International Reagents, Kobe, Japan)-stained smears were used to identify the differential profiles after cytospin preparation. Differential counts were performed by examining 300 cells using a standard light microscope. Data are represented as means ± SEM. *P < 0.05 ** P < 0.01 †P < 0.001. Mϕ = Macrophage, Neu = Neutrophil, Ly = Lymphocyte. LD: lymphocyte-dominant. ND: neutrophil-dominant. MAC: Mycobacterium avium complex.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Subject characteristics.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Cell differentiation status in the lungs of different groups.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

HRCT scores of lavaged pulmonary segments.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Cytokines and chemokines in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids of MAC patients.

Data presented as means ± SEM. *P < 0.05 ** P < 0.01 † P < 0.001. LD: lymphocyte-dominant. ND: neutrophil-dominant. MAC: Mycobacterium avium complex.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 5.

Characteristics of subjects who were followed-up without treatment after the bronchoalveolar lavage.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Local immunological status and disease progression after bronchoalveolar lavage in subjects who were followed-up without treatment.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

HRCT scores of the lavaged pulmonary segment at baseline who were followed-up without treatment after the bronchoalveolar lavage.

More »

Table 7 Expand