Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Methodology scheme of the comparative risk assessment.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Data sources for ambient air pollution exposure.

(a) Area of the study and location of surface monitoring stations network and (b) geographic pattern of population distribution of exposure (Pe).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Summary of relative risks selected to estimate the PAF of ambient air pollution in Thailand.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Annual average and predicted concentrations (1997–2009) by monitoring stations.

(a) PM10 and (b) NO2.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of statistical significance of the air quality data and spatial interpolation models.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Spatial interpolation of change in concentrations (ΔX) of Thailand 2009.

(a) PM10 (μgm-3), (b) NO2 (ppb) and (c) PM2.5 (μgm-3).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Relative risk and population-attributable fractions (PAFs) based on level of ambient air pollutants in Thailand, 2009.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Spatial variations of population attributable fractions (PAF) in Thailand 2009.

(a) All-cause mortality due to PM10, (b) all-cause mortality due to long- term effect of PM2.5, (c) cardiovascular mortality due to long- term effect of PM2.5 and, (d) respiratory mortality due to NO2.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 4.

Avoidable mortality and the percentage of deaths estimated to be caused by level of air pollutant in Thailand (2009).

More »

Table 4 Expand