Fig 1.
Phosphomannomutase activity of PMM1 and PMM2 on Man-6-P monitored by 31P-NMR spectroscopy.
PMM1 or PMM2 (54 μg) were incubated with Man-6-P 1mM and Glc-1,6-P2 0.1 mM at 27°C. Panel A) Spectrum of reagents prior to PMM1 addition. Panel B) Spectrum of products after PMM1 addition. Panel C) Spectrum of reagents prior to PMM2 addition. Panel D) Spectrum of products after PMM2 addition. The spectra were accumulated over 40 min. Creatine phosphate (1 mM) was added as an internal standard and all the spectra were referred to it (0 ppm). Resonance assignment was obtained by comparison with pure compounds: 1, Glc-6-P; 2, Man-6-P; 3 and 5, Man-1,6-P2; 4, Man-1-P; 6 and 7, Glc-1,6-P2; *, inorganic phosphate.
Fig 2.
Phosphomannomutase activity of PMM1 and PMM2 on Man-1-P monitored by 31P-NMR spectroscopy.
PMM1 or PMM2 (54 μg) were incubated with Man-1-P 0.5 mM and Glc-1,6-P2 0.1 mM at 27°C, Panel A) Spectrum of reagents prior to PMM1 addition. Panel B) Spectrum of products after PMM1 addition. Panel C) Spectrum of reagents prior to PMM2 addition. Panel D) Spectrum of products after PMM2 addition. The spectra were accumulated over 40 min. Creatine phosphate (1 mM) was added as an internal standard and all the spectra were referred to it (0 ppm). Resonance assignment was obtained by comparison with pure compounds: 1, Glc-6-P; 2, Man-6-P; 3 and 5, Man-1,6-P2; 4, Man-1-P; 6 and 7, Glc-1,6-P2; *, inorganic phosphate; °, unidentified peaks.
Fig 3.
Phosphatase activity of PMM1 monitored by 31P-NMR spectroscopy.
PMM1 (20 μg) was incubated with Glc-1,6-P2 0.55 mM at 27°C, with and without IMP 0.17 mM. Panel A) Spectrum of reagents, Glc-1,6-P2 and IMP, prior to PMM1 addition. Panel B) Spectrum of products and IMP after PMM1 addition. Panel C) Spectrum of reagents, Glc-1,6-P2, prior to PMM1 addition. Panel D) Spectrum of products after PMM1 addition. Creatine phosphate (1 mM) was added as an internal standard and all the spectra were referred to it (0 ppm). Resonance assignment was obtained by comparison with pure compounds: 1 and 2, Glc-1,6-P2; 3 Glc-1-P+Pi; 4, Glc-6-P; 5, IMP; *, inorganic phosphate.
Fig 4.
PMM1 and PMM2 sequence alignment.
Active site residues are highlighted in grey, residues that are conserved in PMM1 orthologous proteins, but not in PMM2 orthologous proteins are in bold.
Table 1.
Functional parameters of PMM1, PMM2 and QDK-PMM1.
Enzymatic activities were measured at the specified conditions and results were expressed as % of the PMM activity. KM and Ka were determined from a Michaelis-Menten plot.
Fig 5.
Effects of IMP on the phosphatase activity of PMM1, QDK-PMM1 and PMM2.
Panel A) The substrate was Man-1,6-P2 0.08 mM with or without IMP 0.17 mM. Panel B) The substrate was Glc-1,6-P2 0.145 mM with or without IMP 0.17 mM.
Fig 6.
Competitive inhibition of PMM1 mutase activity by IMP.
Phosphoglucomutase activity of PMM1 (Glc-1,6-P2 1 μM and Glc-1-P ranging from 0 to 60 μM) was measured at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 10 μM IMP. Data are shown as Lineweaver-Burk plots.
Fig 7.
Effects of bisphosphonates on the phosphatase and glucomutase activities of PMM1, QDK-PMM1 and PMM2.
Panel A) Phosphoglucomutase activity of PMM1 and PMM2 was measured in the presence of Glc-1-P 40 μM and Glc-1,6-P2 27 μM. Panel B) Glc-1,6-P2-phosphatase activity of PMM1, QDK-PMM1 and PMM2 was measured in the presence of Glc-1,6-P2 0.145 mM. In both cases the activities were also measured in the presence of clodronate (2.8 mM) or neridronate (1.5 mM).
Fig 8.
Thermal stability of phosphomannomutases.
Panel A) Melting temperatures of PMM1 and QDK-PMM1 (0.5 mg/ml) were measured in the presence of different ligands: Glc-1-P 0.5 mM, Glc-1-P 0.5 mM + vanadate 0.5 mM, vanadate 0.5 mM, Glc-1,6-P2 0.5 mM, IMP 0.17 mM. Panel B). Melting temperatures of PMM1 and PMM2 (0.5 mg/ml) were measured in the presence of different concentrations of Glc-1,6-P2 (ranging from 0 to 1 mM). The experiments were conducted at pH 7.5 in the presence of 2.4x SyproOrange by Thermal Shift Assay and the temperature increase was 1°/min from 20 to 90°C.
Fig 9.
In silico docking of IMP and PMM1.
Panel A) Unconstrained simulation. Only 5 trajectories are shown. Structure 52, used for the next refinement simulation, is identified by an asterisk. Panel B) Refinement simulation for structure 52 from traj1 in panel A. The circle, the section mark and the asterisk represent the structure further analyzed (see Fig 10 panel B).
Fig 10.
Panel A) A zoom-in of the interaction between IMP and PMM1 as it is seen in the low energy structure 52 (see Fig 7, panel A): the cap domain is shadowed in light magenta, the core domain is shadowed in grey. Panel B) Refined binding modes: details from energetic minima structures from 3 different trajectories (asterisk -traj5, section mark -traj13, circle -traj14 in Fig 9, panel B).