Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Study design.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Demographic and physical characteristics of the sample population.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Blood hemoglobin concentrations of participant groups as determined by various methods.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Factors influencing the bias of assessed testing methods, as evaluated by univariate and multiple regressions.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Factors influencing the ability of the Pronto® device to generate readings.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Bland-Altman plots for three hemoglobin measurement methods.

Bland-Altman plots for all measurement methods. Y axes: bias produced by each method; X axes: the average of Hb results from each method and the Sysmex KN21. The three plots depict the HemoCue wicking method bias (A), HemoCue gravity method bias (B), and the Pronto device method bias (C).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 5.

Sensitivity, specificity, and correction classification rates for the three methods using a cutoff of 11.5 g/dl*.

More »

Table 5 Expand