Table 1.
New sequences generated.
Fig 1.
Devario devario from Bangladesh, Sylhet: Fenchuganj: a) adult male, NRM 68858, 47.4 mm SL; b) adult female, NRM 68858, 50.7 mm SL.
Fig 2.
Sexual dimorphism in body depth in Devario devario from Bangladesh.
Fig 3.
Collecting localities of species of Devario in Bangladesh and adjacent India.
Table 2.
Morphometry of Devario devario from Bangladesh.
Measurements in per cents of SL, with standard deviation (SD), linear regression (a, intercept; b, slope), and correlation (Pearson’s r).
Table 3.
Counts of lateral line scales in species of Devario from Bangladesh (N = 56).
Asterisk (*) marks count from holotype.
Table 4.
Counts of branched dorsal-fin rays in species of Devario from Bangladesh (N = 56).
Asterisk (*) marks count from holotype.
Table 5.
Counts of branched anal-fin rays in species of Devario from Bangladesh (N = 55).
Asterisk (*) marks count from holotype.
Fig 4.
a) Devario aequipinnatus, young male, NRM 66216, 39.7 mm SL: Madobkundo Falls; b) D. aequipinnatus, young female, DU 9001, 42.3 mm SL: Madobkundo Falls; c) D. aequipinnatus, adult male, DU 6179, 65.7 mm SL, Khagrachori, Richong stream, preserved in 95% ethanol; d) D. coxi, holotype, adult male, DU 9002, 63.8 mm SL, Cox’s Bazar, Majerchora stream; e) D.coxi, paratype, adult female, NRM 68072, 63.4 mm SL, Cox’s Bazar, Majerchora stream.
Table 6.
Devario aequipinnatus from Bangladesh.
Measurements in per cents of SL, with standard deviation (SD); linear regression (a, intercept; b, slope), and correlation (Pearson’s r) if significant in ANOVA at p = 0.
Table 7.
Measurements in per cents of SL, with standard deviation (SD); linear regression (a, intercept; b, slope), and correlation (Pearson’s r) if significant in ANOVA at p = 0. HT = separate data for holotype.
Fig 5.
a) young male, NRM 68075, 50.8 mm SL, Cox’s Bazar, Barachora Stream; b) adult female, 65574, 66.2 mm SL, Cox’s Bazar, Barachora stream; c) young male, NRM 68186, 45.1 mm SL, Bandarban, Sangu River near Ruma.
Fig 6.
Difference in body depth in females of Devario anomalus and D. xyrops.
Table 8.
Morphometry of Devario anomalus.
Measurements in per cents of SL, with standard deviation (SD); linear regression (a, intercept; b, slope), and correlation (Pearson’s r) if significant in ANOVA at p >0.9 but not shown for males in which not significant for most measurements.
Fig 7.
Plot of scores from principal component analysis of pooled measurements from Devario aequipinnatus from Bangladesh, D. anomalus, D. coxi, D. devario and D. xyrops.
Fig 8.
Plot of scores from principal component analysis of pooled measurements from Devario aequipinnatus from Bangladesh, D. anomalus, D. coxi and D. xyrops.
Table 9.
Component loadings in principal component analysis of pooled measurement data from Devario aequipinnatus from Bangladesh, D. anomalus, D. coxi, D. devario from Bangladesh and adjacent India, and D. xyrops.
Table 10.
Component loadings in Principal Component Analysis of pooled measurement data from D. aequipinnatus from Bangladesh D. anomalus, D. coxi, D. anomalus and D. xyrops.
Fig 9.
Phylogram of relationships of striped Devario, based on a Bayesian analysis of 655 bp fragment of the mitochondrial COI gene.
Fig 10.
Phylogram of relationships of selected species of Devario, based on a Bayesian analysis of a 1565 bp fragment of the exon 3 of the nuclear RAG 1 gene, targeting identity of specimens of D. anomalus with D. aequipinnatus mitogenome.
Table 11.
Closest uncorrected pairwise p-distances (percent dissimilarity) between species of striped Devario based on COI sequence data.