Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Demographic data of study population.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Pattern deviation plots of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24–2 test and the HFA 10–2 test, and the corrected probability plot of the Octopus G1 program of the same early glaucoma eye from the study.

The pattern deviation plot of the HFA 24–2 test shows no depressed test point within the central 10° area (the area surrounded by the cross shape line) but the sensitivity is reduced in the more peripheral area of the visual field. The pattern deviation plot of the HFA 10–2 test shows a cluster of depressed test point locations. The peripheral retinal sensitivity is not tested. The corrected probability plot of the Octopus G1 program shows a cluster of reduced sensitivity both in the central 10° area (the region within the inner black circle) and in the periphery.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Central 10 degrees of the visual field with the locations of HFA 24–2, HFA 10–2 and Octopus G1 plotted in the same grid.

The inner circle delimits the central 10 degrees area with test locations of the three tests (HFA 24–2, HFA 10–2 and Octopus G1) marked with different symbols. Cross = HFA 24–2; square = HFA 10–2; triangle = Octopus G1.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Visual field results with the HFA 24–2 and HFA 10–2 test and the Octopus G1 program.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Agreement of the classification of the central 10-degree visual field between the HFA 10–2 test and the Octopus G1 test.

More »

Table 3 Expand