Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Explanation of the different proton nozzles at SMC.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Schematic of SMC proton therapy facility.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Design of each scanning nozzle using Monte Carlo simulation FLUKA.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Feature of the WENDI-2 detector and its Schematic modeled in Monte Carlo simulation.

(Left) The WENDI-2 neutron detector used for measurement of secondary neutron flux (Thermo Scientific), (Right) Schematic of the WENDI-2 detector structure that modeled in FLUKA simulation.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Parameters for data analysis of beam properties.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Experiment equipment to obtain proton beam properties.

(Left) Installation of the ion chamber on the patient table to measure the Bragg peak, R90, R10 and distal fall-off (Zebra multi-layer ion chamber, IBA Inc.), (Right) Installation of the ion chamber in the water phantom for beam spot size measurement.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Measurement of secondary neutrons in each gantry by FLUKA.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

WENDI-2 detector location for secondary neutron dose measurement.

x-axis offset of (A) 44.29 cm, (B) 16.43 cm, (C) -16.43 cm and (D) -44.29 cm, respectively.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Gantry 1 results: 1) Bragg peak, 2) R90, 3) R10, and 4) distal fall-off.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Gantry 2 results: 1) Bragg peak, 2) R90, 3) R10, and 4) distal fall-off.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Results from Gantries 1(Left) and 2(Right) of FWHM of beam spot size.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Normalized secondary neutron dose from 110 MeV proton beam at Gantries 1 and 2 from Monte Carlo simulation.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Normalized secondary neutron dose from 190 MeV proton beam at Gantries 1 and 2 from Monte Carlo simulation.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Comparison of simulated and experimentally measured values of normalized.

More »

Fig 13 Expand