Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Inclusion criteria for SuperAgers and cognitively average elderly adults.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Ryff & Keyes psychological well-being 42-item questionnaire subscale descriptions[22, 23].

Examples of positively worded and negatively worded items are provided.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Demographic & neuropsychological characteristics of the sample.

There were no significant between-group differences in age, education, gender, or race. SuperAgers outperformed their cognitively average-for-age peers on measures of episodic memory and category fluency. There were no other significant between-group differences on neuropsychological measures, including estimated premorbid intelligence.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Psychological well-being in SuperAgers and cognitively average-for-age elderly adults.

Boxplots for Psychological Well-Being 42-Item (PWB-42) subscale scores are shown (medians, interquartile range, and upper/lower quartile ranges). SuperAgers endorsed significantly greater levels of positive relations with others compared to their cognitively average peers (Median SuperAger: 40, Cognitively Average Elderly: 36; p = 0.005). The groups did not differ on other subscales of the PWB-42 (p’s>0.0083) including Autonomy (Median SuperAger: 34, Cognitively Average Elderly: 34), Environmental Mastery (Median SuperAger: 40.5, Cognitively Average Elderly: 37), Personal Growth (Median SuperAger: 36, Cognitively Average Elderly: 37), Purpose in Life (Median SuperAger: 37.5, Cognitively Average Elderly: 37), or Self-Acceptance (Median SuperAger: 38, Cognitively Average Elderly: 37).

More »

Fig 1 Expand