Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Locus-wise genetic variability in walnut germplasm.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Genetic relationships among walnut genotypes.

(A) Neighbor-joining cluster analysis using pair-wise Nei and Li distance matrix. (B) Principal components analysis using multilocus microsatellite genotype data.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Population structure inferred from a model based Bayesian cluster analysis.

(A) Posterior probabilities (Ln Pr X|K) averaged over 20 replicate runs, (B) The ad hoc statistic delta K related to the second order rate of change of log probability of data between successive values of K with a distinct peak at K = 5 with some minor peaks at K = 9, 13, and 16, and (C) Bayesian Inferred population structure of walnut for K = 5 groups.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Within-group genetic variability in walnut.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Inverse distance weighted (IDW) interpolation of allelic diversity estimates in walnut.

(A) allelic richness, (B) private allelic richness, and (C) expected levels of heterozygosity among walnut geographic groups.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Partitioning genetic variation within and among geographic groups in walnut.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Genetic differentiation among geographic groups in walnut.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Pair-wise FST values showing genetic differentiation among geographic groups in walnut.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Model settings (evaluation metrics) for AICc-selected MaxEnt model predictions.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 4.

Ecological niche modeling of walnut distributions.

AICc-selected model prediction of occurrence of walnut for current, last glacial maximum (LGM; 21–18 kyr BP), and last interglacial (LIG; 130–107 kyr BP) climatic conditions for the data set filtered at 10 km with 137 occurrence points (refer to Table 6 for feature class and regularization multiplier settings).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 7.

Pair-wise Schoener’s D statistic measuring niche similarity among the current, LGM, and LIG model predictions.

More »

Table 7 Expand