Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Short description of the four protected area categories selected for the analysis (for more detailed description see S1 Text).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Main sources for defining principles and criteria of climate change-robustness used in the evaluation protocol (listed in chronological order).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Principles and criteria of climate change-robustness (comprehensive list of principles and criteria with full titles, further description, rationale and references can be found in S1 Table).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Classification of performance of climate change-robustness principles as per rate and degree of accordance.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 1.

Distribution of climate change-robustness scores for the 60 protected areas analyzed.

The climate change-robustness is the sum of the 44 individual scores for each management plan reached by scoring all plans against each of the respective four criteria of each principle on a 0–2 scale. Mean value = 18, median = 14.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Distribution of protected area plans relative to the maximum performance of climate change-robustness.

The performance of plans was normalized relative to the maximum performance of a score of 46 out of a maximum of 88.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Relationship between the four protected area categories and climate change-robustness.

BR = biosphere reserves, NLP = national parks, NP = nature parks, N2000 = Natura 2000 sites; different capital letters indicate significantly different groups.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Relationship between protected area size and climate change-robustness of Natura 2000 sites.

R = 0.58, p-value = 0.001406.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Standardised breadth, depth and total quality scores of the eleven robustness principles in descending order of total quality.

Breath score = Number of plans that address the principle (max. 1.00), depth = intensity of addressing the principle (max 1.00), total quality = sum of breadth and depth score (max. 2.00).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Total quality scores for the principles of climate change-robust conservation management sorted by protected area category.

BR = biosphere reserves, NLP = national parks, NP = nature parks, N2000 = Natura 2000 sites.

More »

Fig 6 Expand