Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

CCDF of clipping PAPR reduction technique.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

PDF of clipped OFDM signal amplitude.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Block diagram of SLM.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

CCDF of OFDM signal with SLM technique.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

PDF of OFDM signal amplitude with SLM technique.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

System parameters.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 6.

Proposed PAPR reduction apparatus that uses SLM and clipping technique.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Flow chart for an example of using combination of SLM and clipping PAPR reduction technique.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

CCDF of OFDM signal using combined technique.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 2.

PAPR performance (dB) when CCDF = 10−3.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 9.

PDF of OFDM signal amplitude using combined technique.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Error vector magnitude (EVM) (%).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Normalized power spectral density (PSD).

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Normalized distortion power versus CR, V = 1, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Normalized distortion power versus CR, matching analysis to the simulaiton, V = 32.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

SE (bps/Hz) versus SNR (dB), when V = 32, ν = ∞, 5, 3dB.

Solid lines indicate the simulation results, and dotted line indicates the anlaytic results.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

EE (bps/Hz) versus SNR (dB), when V = 32, ν = ∞, 5, 3dB.

Solid lines indicate the simulation results, and dotted lines indicate the anlaytical results.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

(a) Cell SE (bps/H) and (b) Cell EE (bps/Hz/W).

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Relative EE comparison between single technique and combined technique.

More »

Fig 17 Expand