Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Sample characteristics of the study population.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Graphical rendering of tractographies in a representative subject.

Tractographies of the left-hand side of the dorsal cingulum (A), the ventral cingulum (B), the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF; C), and the corticospinal tract (CST; D) segmented from a whole-brain tractography and superimposed on a mid-sagittal FA map.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

FLAIR images of two different representative subjects with different WMH load.

Subject A represents lower WMH load (i.e. a WMH volume ≤ 0.5% of the intracranial volume that corresponded approximately to Fazekas grade 0–1) and subject B higher WMH load (i.e. a WMH volume ≥ 1% of the intracranial volume that corresponded approximately to Fazekas grade 2–3), with arrows indicating example regions with WMH.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of MD and FA between the matched subgroups of cognitively healthy elderly with lowera and higherb WMH load, respectively, using a two-tailed Student’s t-test.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Multivariate linear regression analyses of MD and FA in the dorsal and ventral cingulum, the SLF, and the CST in cognitively healthy elderly (n = 132) and prodromal AD subjects (n = 83) unadjusted (model 1) and adjusted (model 2) for WMH volume, respectively.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Effect size of group mean expressed as Cohen’s d and group size (n, patient group + control group) for WMH in the present study and various pathological conditions previously studied using DTI.

More »

Table 4 Expand