Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

CONSORT flowchart.

After enrollment, patients were randomized to either continue consuming high AGE diet, or a one month dAGE restriction. Stool and blood samples were collected at baseline and after intervention. AGEs, Advanced glycation end products; GI, gastrointestinal; PO, per os.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Patient basic characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

AGE levels before and after intervention.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

One month dAGE restriction resulted in changes in gut bacterial microbiota.

Operational taxonomic units were annotated and analyzed at species levels, and shows no difference in microbiota projection onto the principal components at baseline (A), followed by changes after dietary intervention (B). HAGE, high advanced glycation end products group; LAGE, low advanced glycation end products group.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Species (A), genus (B), and Phyla (C) differences between groups at baseline and after intervention.

HAGE (bl), high advanced glycation end products group at baseline; LAGE (bl), low advanced glycation end products group at baseline; HAGE (Int), high advanced glycation end products group after intervention; LAGE (Int), low advanced glycation end products group after intervention. The top ten species in relative abundance (74%) are shown in Fig 3A, full species are shown in S2 Fig.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Shannon-Wiener diversity index indicating no differences among groups before and after intervention (bars and columns represent diversity index mean ± standard deviation).

HAGE (bl), high advanced glycation end products group at baseline; LAGE (bl), low advanced glycation end products group at baseline; HAGE (Int), high advanced glycation end products group after intervention; LAGE (Int), low advanced glycation end products group after intervention.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Species with significant differences between the groups.

More »

Table 3 Expand