Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Epistemic beliefs item wording.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Conspiracist ideation (OSoC 2016).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Beliefs about issues (NSF 2016).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Beliefs about issues (NSF 2016).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Epistemological belief composite scores, descriptives and zero-order correlations with related concepts.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 1.

Scatterplots with locally weighted regression lines.

Values shown are for composite scales. Size of marker corresponds to number of cases. Fit lines drawn using iterative least squares (Loess) with 50% of the data points to calculate the local smoother via the Epanechnikov kernel function. Fit lines suggest a modest linear relationship between conspiracist ideation and each of the three epistemic beliefs.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Structural equation model summarizing factors associated with conspiracist ideation.

Circles denote latent variables; education is manifest. All links shown are standardized and significant; p < .02. Except for education, manifest variables and their loadings are not shown. Disturbances on endogenous factors are also omitted from the figure. Path coefficients for all three epistemic beliefs measures indicate that these factors have an influence on conspiracist ideation that is comparable to or larger than other established predictors.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 6.

Structural equation models summarizing factors associated with lagged issue accuracy.

More »

Table 6 Expand