Fig 1.
Explanatory diagram of the azimuth for tilt and decentration measurements.
The azimuth angle of tilt and decentration for the crystalline lens or the IOL is based on a coordinate system in which the zero degrees is located to the observer's right and 90 degrees is in the superior direction.
Table 1.
General characteristics of the patient group.
Fig 2.
Tilt of each crystalline lens relative to the corneal topographic axis under non-mydriatic (A, B) and mydriatic (C, D) conditions. The crystalline lens tended to tilt towards the inferotemporal direction relative to the corneal topographic axis under both non-mydriatic and mydriatic conditions.
Fig 3.
Tilt of each IOL relative to the corneal topographic axis under non-mydriatic (A, B) and mydriatic (C, D) conditions. The IOL tended to tilt towards the inferotemporal direction relative to the corneal topographic axis under both non-mydriatic and mydriatic conditions.
Fig 4.
Decentration of each crystalline lens relative to the corneal topographic axis under non-mydriatic (A, B) and mydriatic conditions (C, D). The crystalline lens tended to shift towards the temporal direction relative to the corneal topographic axis under both non-mydriatic and mydriatic conditions.
Fig 5.
Decentration of each IOL relative to the corneal topographic axis under non-mydriatic (A, B), and mydriatic (C, D) conditions. The IOL tended to shift towards the temporal direction relative to the corneal topographic axis under both non-mydriatic and mydriatic conditions.
Table 2.
Mean tilt and decentration of the crystalline lens and the IOL.
Table 3.
Spearman correlation between non-mydriatic and mydriatic data.
Table 4.
Intraclass correlation coefficients calculated between pre- and postoperative tilt data from the crystalline lens and the intraocular lens.
Table 5.
Intraclass correlation coefficients calculated between pre- and postoperative decentration data from the crystalline lens and the intraocular lens.