Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Global subregions and number of expert panelists with more than 3 years of work experience in the subregion.

Subregions are defined on the basis of child and adult mortality as described by Ezzati et al. (2002) [18]. Stratum A: very low child and adult mortality; Stratum B: low child mortality and very low adult mortality; Stratum C: low child mortality and high adult mortality; Stratum D: high child and adult mortality; and Stratum E: high child mortality and very high adult mortality. AFR = Africa Region; AMR = Region of the Americas; EMR = Eastern Mediterranean Region; EUR = European Region; SEAR = South-East Asia Region; WPR = Western Pacific Region. Havelaar et al. 2015 provides a list of countries in each subregion [1]. The use of the term ‘subregion’ here and throughout the text does not identify an official grouping of WHO Member States, and the ‘subregions’ are not related to the six official WHO regions [16]. Values in circles indicate the number of experts in panels in each region.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Food exposure routes elicited in WHO global burden of foodborne disease expert elicitation by pathogen*.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Attribution of foodborne illnesses to food contamination at the point it enters the place of final preparation for consumption.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Example calibration questions used in WHO global burden of foodborne disease source attribution expert elicitation.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Example food source attribution questions provided in expert elicitation instructions.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Ascaris spp.

Proportion of foodborne disease attributable to specific foods: Median estimate, and 90% and 95% uncertainty intervals by parasite and subregion. “Small ruminants’ meat” was listed as “Goat, lamb and other small ruminants’ meat” in the expert elicitation instrument. The X-axis labels are percentages. The dot represents the median estimate; the dark black line, the 90% uncertainty interval; and the gray line the 95% uncertainty interval.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Cryptosporidium spp.

Proportion of foodborne disease attributable to specific foods: Median estimate, and 90% and 95% uncertainty intervals by parasite and subregion. “Small ruminants’ meat” was listed as “Goat, lamb and other small ruminants’ meat” in the expert elicitation instrument. The X-axis labels are percentages. The dot represents the median estimate; the dark black line, the 90% uncertainty interval; and the gray line the 95% uncertainty interval.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Echinococcus granulosus.

Proportion of foodborne disease attributable to specific foods: Median estimate, and 90% and 95% uncertainty intervals by parasite and subregion. “Small ruminants’ meat” was listed as “Goat, lamb and other small ruminants’ meat” in the expert elicitation instrument. The X-axis labels are percentages. The dot represents the median estimate; the dark black line, the 90% uncertainty interval; and the gray line the 95% uncertainty interval.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Echinococcus multilocularis.

Proportion of foodborne disease attributable to specific foods: Median estimate, and 90% and 95% uncertainty intervals by parasite and subregion. “Small ruminants’ meat” was listed as “Goat, lamb and other small ruminants’ meat” in the expert elicitation instrument. The X-axis labels are percentages. The dot represents the median estimate; the dark black line, the 90% uncertainty interval; and the gray line the 95% uncertainty interval.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Entamoeba histolytica.

Proportion of foodborne disease attributable to specific foods: Median estimate, and 90% and 95% uncertainty intervals by parasite and subregion. “Small ruminants’ meat” was listed as “Goat, lamb and other small ruminants’ meat” in the expert elicitation instrument. The X-axis labels are percentages. The dot represents the median estimate; the dark black line, the 90% uncertainty interval; and the gray line the 95% uncertainty interval.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Giardia spp.

Proportion of foodborne disease attributable to specific foods: Median estimate, and 90% and 95% uncertainty intervals by parasite and subregion. “Small ruminants’ meat” was listed as “Goat, lamb and other small ruminants’ meat” in the expert elicitation instrument. The X-axis labels are percentages. The dot represents the median estimate; the dark black line, the 90% uncertainty interval; and the gray line the 95% uncertainty interval.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Toxoplasma gondii.

Proportion of foodborne disease attributable to specific foods: Median estimate, and 90% and 95% uncertainty intervals by parasite and subregion. “Small ruminants’ meat” was listed as “Goat, lamb and other small ruminants’ meat” in the expert elicitation instrument. The X-axis labels are percentages. The dot represents the median estimate; the dark black line, the 90% uncertainty interval; and the gray line the 95% uncertainty interval.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Brucella spp.

Proportion of foodborne disease attributable to specific foods: Median estimate, and 90% and 95% uncertainty intervals by bacteria and subregion. “Small ruminants’ meat” was listed as “Goat, lamb and other small ruminants’ meat” in the expert elicitation instrument. The X-axis labels are percentages. The dot represents the median estimate; the dark black line, the 90% uncertainty interval; and the gray line the 95% uncertainty interval.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Campylobacter spp.

Proportion of foodborne disease attributable to specific foods: Median estimate, and 90% and 95% uncertainty intervals by bacteria and subregion. “Small ruminants’ meat” was listed as “Goat, lamb and other small ruminants’ meat” in the expert elicitation instrument. The X-axis labels are percentages. The dot represents the median estimate; the dark black line, the 90% uncertainty interval; and the gray line the 95% uncertainty interval.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Non-typhoidal Salmonella spp.

Proportion of foodborne disease attributable to specific foods: Median estimate, and 90% and 95% uncertainty intervals by bacteria and subregion. “Small ruminants’ meat” was listed as “Goat, lamb and other small ruminants’ meat” in the expert elicitation instrument. The X-axis labels are percentages. The dot represents the median estimate; the dark black line, the 90% uncertainty interval; and the gray line the 95% uncertainty interval.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC).

Proportion of foodborne disease attributable to specific foods: Median estimate, and 90% and 95% uncertainty intervals by bacteria and subregion. “Small ruminants’ meat” was listed as “Goat, lamb and other small ruminants’ meat” in the expert elicitation instrument. The X-axis labels are percentages. The dot represents the median estimate; the dark black line, the 90% uncertainty interval; and the gray line the 95% uncertainty interval.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 3.

Campylobacter spp.

Percent of foodborne illnesses attributed to specified food exposures from prior national studies and this study.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Cryptosporidium spp.

Percent of foodborne illnesses attributed to specified food exposures from prior national studies and this study*.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Non-typhoidal Salmonella spp.

Percent of foodborne illnesses attributed to specified food exposures from prior national studies and this study.

More »

Table 5 Expand