Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics of the breast cancer cohort.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Correlation between the MammaPrint risk classification and the EP score (left) and EPclin score (right).

Threshold values for EP- and EPclin-based risk classification are indicated as dashed lines.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Correlation between EP/ EPclin score and MammaPrint.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Correlation of the Ki-67 proliferation indices and MammaPrint (A), EP (B) or EPclin (C) score risk classification (threshold values of Ki-67 are registered as vertical dashed lines. Tumour cells with a Ki-67 proliferation index <15% were scored as negative, 16%-25% as intermediate and >25% as positive).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Decision impact analysis.

A) Initial choice of therapy based on taking only the clinico-pathological parameters tumour size, nodal status and hormone receptor status as well as HER2 status into account B) Actual choice of therapy based on the inclusion of the MammaPrint test result C) Hypothetical choice of therapy based on the inclusion of the EPclin Score test result instead of the MammaPrint results.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Overview of the risk classification of patients with distant metastasis during observation time.

More »

Table 3 Expand