Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Total number of records for each hospital under study, and their respective readmission rates.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Data breakdown by hospital admission year.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

summary of the population under study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of extracted feature categories, and two sample features per category.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Neural Network model architecture (Note: Layer sizes are assuming all features are used).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparison of NN model performance (with retrospective validation) vs number of features.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Top most correlated features with 30-day readmission.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of the performance of our models with that of LACE, assuming a 25% intervention rate.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Performance of our model versus LACE on 2015 data when trained on data through 2014.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparison of artificial neural network model with LACE in 4 different age brackets.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparison of the model performance among top five Sutter Health hospitals by the number of inpatient records.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Comparison of the neural network model’s performance among subgroups with varying medical conditions.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 6.

Comparison of performance of each feature group on the neural network model, tested by withholding one feature group at a time and measuring the impact on model AUC.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 8.

The projected saving values as a function of the intervention rate, with the example parameters given for the cost-savings analysis in the results section.

More »

Fig 8 Expand