Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow diagram of the diagnostic algorithm.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flow diagram of participant enrolment.

Note that for illustrative purposes in this flow diagram, if either reader recorded a positive result then it is recorded as positive in this Figure.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Sensitivity of the tests.

Points represent the estimates and lines the 95% CIs. Active and passive refer to active and passive screening.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Screening test sensitivity.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Specificity of the tests.

Points represent the estimates and lines the 95% CIs. Note the y-axis range is 90–100%. Active and passive refer to active and passive screening.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Screening test specificity.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

False discovery and false omission rates.

FDR and FOR of each test followed by CRS over a range of prevalences, which were calculated based on the sensitivity and specificity of the algorithms that were found in this study.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 3.

Combinations of positive screening tests.

More »

Table 3 Expand