Fig 1.
Example of the four conditions used in Experiment 1.
For copyright reasons, this figure is for illustration only and not the actual stimuli. Altered from [53].
Table 1.
Summary of linear mixed effects models predicting ratings of faces with different abnormalities.
Fig 2.
The effect of each type of abnormality on mean ratings of cuteness (left) and attractiveness (right).
Bars show the mean difference from the no abnormality condition, calculated within each item (face), and standardised by the standard deviation of this condition. Error bars show the 95% confidence intervals around this difference.
Fig 3.
Example of the four haemangioma categories used in Experiment 2.
For copyright reasons, this figure is for illustration only and not the actual stimuli. Altered from [53].
Table 2.
Results from a linear mixed effects model predicting attractiveness/cuteness rating from location of a haemangioma.
Fig 4.
The effect of haemangioma on ratings of cuteness and attractiveness in Experiment 2.
Bars show model estimates from the LME models reported in the text, as well as 95% confidence intervals from 1000 bootstrapped simulations.
Fig 5.
The effect of differently located haemangioma on ratings of cuteness/attractiveness.
Bars show the mean difference from the no abnormality condition, across items, and standardised by the standard deviation of this condition. Error bars show the 95% confidence intervals around this difference.