Table 1.
Characteristics of the validation sample and the reliability sample.
Fig 1.
Body volume measurement agreement between 3D photonic body surface standard scan and air-displacement plethysmography (N = 32).
(a) Body volume measured by 3DPS and ADP plotted on the regression line. Dashed line: line of identity (y = 1*x + 0). (b) Differences in body volume measurements from 3DPS and ADP plotted against their mean. Solid line: mean measurement difference (3DPS–ADP), dashed lines: limits of agreement.
Table 2.
Body volume and %body fat from 3D photonic body surface scans (3DPS) and air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) and measurement differences between both methods.
Fig 2.
%Body fat measurement differences between 3D photonic body surface standard scan and air-displacement plethysmography (N = 31).
(a) %Body fat estimated from 3DPS and ADP plotted on the regression line. Dashed line: line of identity (y = 1*x + 0). (b) Differences in %body fat measurements from 3DPS and ADP plotted against their mean. Solid line: mean measurement difference (3DPS–ADP), dashed lines: limits of agreement.
Table 3.
Linear regression models for the prediction of air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) measured body volume and %body fat on basis of 3D photonic body surface (3DPS) standard scan.
Table 4.
Reliability of the 3D photonic body surface scanner.