Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Identification of upregulation of SIK3 specifically following a high salt synergized IL-17 stimulation of breast cancer cells.

(A) Identification of the 1.9 fold higher enriched phospho-peptide sequence following high salt induced stimulation of MCF-7 cells. The identified sequence demonstrated 100% homology to the SIK3 protein at the serine-493 residue. (B) Western blot analysis of SIK3 expression in total cell lysate. Immunoprecipitation of SIK3 is probed with phospho-serine antibody. As can be noted, SIK3 expression was upregulated following treatment with high salt (0.05 M NaCl) and IL-17 (0.1 ng/mL) individually, further, SIK3 expression was synergistically elevated following co-treatment with high salt and IL-17. Equimolar mannitol (0.05 M) and sucrose (0.05 M) were used as negative controls. (C) mRNA transcript expression of SIK3 by ΔΔcT method of quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction normalized for GADPH demonstrated a significant upregulation following high salt (7.3±1.4 fold) and IL-17 (9.1±1.7 fold), and co-treatment with both high salt and IL-17 induced a (28.6±4.4 fold) synergistically enhanced expression. (D) Densitometry quantitation of phospho-SIK3 in (B) demonstrated a synergistically enhanced phosphorylation of SIK3 by high salt and IL-17. (E-G) Expression of SIK3 following co-treatment with high salt and IL-17 in five breast tissue related cell lines (E) were used in our studies, of these, four breast cancer cells (MCF7, MDA-MB-231, BT20, AU565) and one non-malignant breast epithelial cell line (MCF10A); mRNA transcript analysis in 5 cell lines (F); densitometry quantitation of phosphorylated SIK3 in five cell lines (G). (H-J) Anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 (IL-10) inhibited the expression of SIK3 protein (H), mRNA transcript (I) and phosphorylation of SIK3(J). (K) To demonstrate the phosphorylation is specifically on Serine-493 of SIk3 we clone the SIK3 into MCF10A cell line and latter stimulated by co-treatment with high salt and IL-17. Of note, wild type MCF10A did not demonstrate SIK3 expression following co-treatment with high salt and IL-17 (E-G). Mutation of serine to alanine (SΔA493-SIK3) did not demonstration any binding with phospho-serine in SIK3 immunoprecipitate. (L) Cell proliferation of MCF-7 cells was inhibited following SIK3 siRNA treatment following co-treatment with high salt and IL-17. Of note, we have previously demonstrated that (Ref [6, 13]) co-treatment with high salt and IL-17 induced a 25% higher proliferation of MCF-7 cancer cells. The other three cancer cells MDA-MB-231 (29% higher), BT-20 (31% higher) and AU565 (24% higher) cell proliferation following co-treatment with high salt and IL-17, while non-malignant breast epithelial MCF10A cells did not demonstrate any enhanced proliferation following similar treatment conditions. All data represented as mean values ± SEM from four independent experiments. Student-t-test performed for statistical analysis (significance p<0.05).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

mTORC2 is an upstream upregulator of SIK3 expression and phosphorylation.

(A) Schematic of the potential interplay between mTOR2 and SIK3. (B) Phosphorylation of HDAC4, AKT, and S6K1 the downstream targets for SIK3, mTOR1 and mTOR2, respectively, were analyzed following stimulation with high salt and IL-17, individually and combined by Western blot. (C) Phosphorylation of HDAC4, AKT, and S6K1 the downstream targets for SIK3, mTOR1 and mTOR2, respectively, were analyzed by Western blot following co-treatment with high salt and IL-17, and Knock down of SIK3, RAPTOR and RICTOR. Scramble siRNA of the original construct were used as controls. (D) Activity of HDAC4, Akt and S6K1 were analyzed by ELISA under various conditions mentioned in (C). Of note, HDAC4 activity was decreased following SIK3 and RICTOR knock down, while, mTOR2 downstream target AKT and mTOR1 downstream target S6K1 activity was decreased following RICTOR and RAPTOR, respectively. All data represented as mean values ± SEM from four independent experiments. Student-t-test performed for statistical analysis (significance p<0.05).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

High salt synergized with IL-17 to induce SIK3 mediated G0/G1-release in cell cycle.

(A) Schematic of cell cycle and potential impact of co-treatment with high salt and IL-17. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle following treatment with high salt and IL-17, individually and combined. (C) Relative percentage of cells (%) in G0/G1-, S-, and G2/M-phase following various treatment conditions mentioned above. (D-E) Impact of SIK3 knockdown by siRNA on the three cell cycle phases. (F-G) Temporal Synchronization cell cycle studies following initial chemical synchronization to either G0/G1-, S-, or G2/M-phase and followed by co-treatment with high salt and IL-17 with cell cycle analysis done at 0, 12, 24 and 48 hour time points. The last panel is with cells initially synchronized to various cell cycle phases followed by co-treatment with high salt and IL-17 for 12 hours, followed by siRNA transfection (SIK3 or scramble) at 12 hours and followed by co-treatment with high salt and IL-17 for another 36 hours and data analyzed at 48 hour-time point. (H) Analysis of G0/G1-phase release mediating CDK2 and G2/M-phase release mediating CDK1 activity at 48 hour time point following treatment with high salt and IL-17 individually and combined. As can be noted, co-treatment with high salt and IL-17 induced CDK2 activity and release from G0/G1-phase arrest of cell cycle. (I) Analysis of G0/G1-phase release mediating CDK2 and G2/M-phase release mediating CDK1 activity following siRNA knockdown of SIK3 (as mentioned under F-G)and co-treatment with high salt and IL-17. All data represented as mean values ± SEM from four independent experiments. Student-t-test performed for statistical analysis (significance p<0.05).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

High salt synergized with IL-17 to induce SIK3 mediated pro-inflammatory nitric oxide release components of arginine metabolism while suppressing anti-inflammatory components of arginine metabolism.

(A) Schematic of arginine metabolism under potential pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory stimulus conditions. (B) Western blot analysis of the pro-inflammation mediating enzymes inducible nitric oxide synthetase (iNOS) and arginosuccinate synthetase (ASS-1); and anti-inflammation mediating enzymes arginase-1 (Arg-1) and ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) following co-treatment with high salt and IL-17 along with SIK3 knockdown. (C-G) production of reactive nitrogen species (C), nitric oxide (D), citrulline (E), urea (F) and arginase activity (G) following co-treatment with high salt and IL-17, along with SIK3 knock down. All data represented as mean values ± SEM from four independent experiments. Student-t-test performed for statistical analysis (significance p<0.05).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

High salt synergized with IL-17 to induced SIK3 mediated expression of tumor metastatic CXCR4 through MMP-9 activation.

(A) Schematic of the metastasis mediating CXCL12/CXR4. (B) ELISA-based analysis in the cell supernatant for the CXCL12 expression following co-treatment with high salt and IL-17 along with SIK3 knockdown or MMP-9 inhibitor (10 μM, 2-(N-Benzyl-4-methoxyphenylsulfonamido)-5-((diethylamino)methyl)-N-hydroxy-3-methylbenzamide, ab142180, AbCam, Cambridge, MA) or CXCR4 blocked with specific monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX). (C) Gelatin Zymography to analysis the MMP-9/-2 activity under the above mentioned treatment conditions. (D) Ratio of inducible MMP-9 to constitutive MMP-2 activity under above mentioned treatment conditions. (E) Flow cytometry-based analysis in the membrane localization of the CXCR-4 following co-treatment with high salt and IL-17 along with SIK3 knockdown or MMP-9 inhibitor or CXCL12 blocked with specific monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX). All data represented as mean values ± SEM from four independent experiments. Student-t-test performed for statistical analysis (significance p<0.05).

More »

Fig 5 Expand