Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow diagram of study selection.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of included trials.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Outcome of risk of bias assessment by type of bias (Note: PEO = psycho-educational outcomes).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Random effects meta-analysis of change scores in HbA1c (%) in psycho-educational intervention group compared with control group.

Intervention effects calculated as Standardised Mean Difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval. A negative effect indicates improved glycaemic control attributable to intervention.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Intervention effects on psychosocial outcomes calculated as Standardised Mean Difference (SMD) of change scores with 95% confidence interval.

A positive effect in quality of life, self-efficacy, and family functioning and a negative effect is psychological distress favour intervention. The diamonds show the pooled SMD based on random effects model. Notes: SED = Self-efficacy for diabetes; PedsQoL-D = Paediatric quality of life inventory: diabetes module; DQoLY = Diabetes Quality of life measure for youths (reverse scaling); PedsQoL-G = Paediatric quality of life inventory: generic scale; PAID = Problem Areas in Diabetes scale; SDQ = Strengths and difficulties Questionnaire- impact score; ECBI = Eyberg child behavior inventory; PIP = Paediatric Inventory for parents; WBQ = Well-being questionnaire (reverse scaling); DFRQ = Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (dyadic score in Christie (2014) and parental report in Murphy (2012)); DFCS = Diabetes family conflict scale; DFBS = Diabetes Family Behavior scale.

More »

Fig 4 Expand