Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Annual performance improvement rates (KJ) for 27 domains.

The value of KJ for each domain is the slope of a linear curve fitted to log of the performance metric versus time using data from 1976 until 2013. The rates vary widely, from 3 to 65 percent. Adapted from Magee, Basnet, Funk and Benson 2016.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Examples of text from patents describing interactions, and associated keywords.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Cross-domain usage of keywords (KW) ‘parasitic’ (panel a) and ‘prevent’ (panel b) across 27 domains.

The keyword ‘parasitic’ is not widely used; in fact, 12 domains do not use the ‘parasitic’ keyword at all. Compare this to wide cross-domain usage of keyword ‘prevent’. The count of KW presented is a normalized count of the respective keyword, with normalization carried out against 100 thousand total words.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison of count of normalized 6-keywords (KW) for 27 domains.

The count of KW is the normalized total count of 6 keywords identified to indicate interactions in the text (abstract, title, background, and summary of invention) from the 100 most-cited patents in each domain, where normalization is carried out with respect to total number of all words in the text, and expressed per 100 thousand words.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Scatter plot of KJ (annual improvement rates) and 1/KW (reciprocal of normalized count of keywords for 27 domains.

Improvement rates are positively correlated with Pearson correlation coefficient = +0.56 with p-value = 0.002, and Spearman Rank Order correlation = +0.632 with p-value = 0.001. Note that capacitor and electric power transmission data points overlap, and hence appear as one point. The dashed line shows a linear trend line between KJ and 1/KW.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Scatter plot of Pearson correlation coefficients for KJ (improvement rates) and 1/KW (reciprocal of normalized count of keywords) for 20 groups.

The average correlation coefficient (r) is +0.59 with standard deviation of 0.10. The coefficient value for 27 domain as a whole is 0.56. Each group consists of a combination of 14 randomly selected domains from the 27 domains.

More »

Fig 5 Expand