Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical information.

OKS: Oxford Knee Score, PCS: Pain Catastrophizing Scale, TSK: Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Frequency of responses to each item of the FreKAQ-J.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Item-person threshold map.

Persons of lesser disturbed body perception and items easier to endorse are located on the left side of the logit scale (ie, < 0 logits); Persons of higher disturbed body perception and items of greater difficulty to endorse are located to the right of the logit scale (ie, > 0 logits). Item endorsability mean is set at 0 logits by default.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Average item endorsability thresholds, including fit statistics.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Differential test functioning between the FreBAQ-J and FreKAQ-J.

The dashed line shows a trend-line through the mean of both sets of items, and the black lines show the upper and lower 95% confidence bands.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Probability curves for the 5-category Japanese version of the Fremantle Knee Awareness Questionnaire.

C0, never; C1, rarely; C2, occasionally; C3, sometimes; C4, always).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Average category score thresholds, including fit statistics.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Correlations between the FreKAQ-J total score and clinical symptom.

More »

Table 5 Expand