Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Number of identified instrumental SNPs for metabolic factors, phenotype distribution in the discovery sample, and proportion of phenotype variance explained by the instruments.

SD: standard deviation.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Forest plot of lung cancer overall risk for one standard deviation (Table 1) increase in each phenotype provided by the MR likelihood-based approach.

CI: Confidence interval. P: P value.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Forest plot of lung cancer risk for each SD increase in BMI (approximately 4.6 kg/m2) observed in the likelihood-based MR approach.

95%CI: 95% Confidence Interval; P: P value. I2: between-strata heterogeneity. PHet: P value of between-strata heterogeneity.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Funnel plots for the distribution of risk estimates of BMI instrumental SNPs along with MR causal effect lung cancer subtypes.

OR: Odds ratio; Int: Intercept; P: P value.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Forest plot of lung cancer risk for each SD increase in LDL (approximately 38.0 mg/dl) observed in the likelihood-based MR approach using the instrument set of common SNPs.

95%CI: 95% Confidence Interval; P: P value. I2: between-strata heterogeneity. PHet: P value of between-strata heterogeneity.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Forest plot of lung cancer risk for each SD increase in fasting insulin (approximately 44.4 pmol/L) observed in the likelihood-based MR approach.

95%CI: 95% Confidence Interval; P: P value. I2: between-strata heterogeneity. PHet: P value of between-strata heterogeneity.

More »

Fig 5 Expand