Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Image of the patient setup with ExacTrac frameless radiosurgery positioning array (BrainLAB AG, Feldkirchen, Germany).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Patient characteristics and treatments included.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Image registration using kV tube 1 and tube 2 with the BrainLAB ExacTrac for patient #18.

(a) DRR image; (b) ExacTrac image; and (c) image registration.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Image registration using planning computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for patient #18 with offline 6D fusion in offline review.

(a) Axial planes; (b) Coronal planes; and (c) Sagittal planes.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Histogram and normalized curves for the translational and rotational variations between the 6D ExacTrac and the 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

(a) Lateral (x-axis); (b) longitudinal (z-axis); (c) vertical (y-axis); and (d) yaw dimensions.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Histogram and normalized curves for the translational and rotational variations between the 6D ExacTrac and the 6D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

(a) Lateral (x-axis); (b) longitudinal (z-axis); (c) vertical (y-axis); (d) pitch; (e) roll; and (f) yaw dimensions.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Histogram and normalized curves for the translational and rotational variations between the 3D CBCT and the 6D CBCT.

(a) Lateral (x-axis); (b) Longitudinal (z-axis); (c) Vertical (y-axis), and (d) Yaw dimensions.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 2.

Residual setup errors and differences among the 6D ExacTrac, 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and 6D CBCT when used for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (N = 107, n = 138).

Residual setup errors reported by Ma et al. [10] and Chang et al. [12] are also shown.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 7.

Box and whisker plots of the translational variations in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions with 6D ExacTrac, 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and 6D CBCT.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Box and whisker plots of the rotational variations in the pitch, roll, and yaw directions with 6D ExacTrac, 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and 6D CBCT.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Box and whisker plots of the translational difference variations in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions for the 6D ExacTrac vs. 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), 6D ExacTrac vs. 6D CBCT, and 3D CBCT vs. 6D CBCT.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Box and whisker plots of the rotational difference variations in the pitch, roll, and yaw directions for the 6D ExacTrac vs. 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), 6D ExacTrac vs. 6D CBCT, and 3D CBCT vs. 6D CBCT.

More »

Fig 10 Expand