Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow chart of study design.

*Two participants in MRI conditions were reassigned to the no-contact control group after being unable to tolerate MRI scanning. Participants removed from analysis due to training contamination, low training dosage, or data acquisition issues.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Participant characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Mean performance for training tasks.

Performance accuracy for the working memory training group (A-C), and mean reaction times by training game for the processing speed training group (D-F).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Participant motivation and expectation.

Self-rated motivation to complete training (A), and expectations for improvement (B) on the training tasks throughout the training period. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

WAIS-IV performance by group, before and after training.

Verbal Comprehension Index (A); Perceptual Reasoning Index (B); Working Memory Index (C); Processing Speed Index (D); Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (E). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Measures of working memory capacity and fluid intelligence before and after training.

Automated Operation Span (A), Spatial Delayed Response Task (B-C), Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices (D), and Cattell’s Culture Fair Test (E) performance by group before and after training. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

More »

Fig 5 Expand