Fig 1.
Flow chart of study selection and inclusion.
Table 1.
Characteristics of included studies.
Table 2.
Quality assessment of included diagnostic accuracy studies using QUADAS-2.
Fig 2.
Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness in children assessed by forest plots.
The point estimates of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio for each study are shown as solid circles.
Fig 3.
Summary receiver operating characteristic curve of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness in children.
Solid circles represent each study included in the meta-analysis.
Table 3.
Main results of individual studies.
Table 4.
Main results of subgroup analysis.