Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

PICOS; Inclusion/exclusion criteria.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Dietary counselling (individuals).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Dietary counselling (worksite/schools).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Dietary counselling (community).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Media campaigns.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Labelling.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Reformulation.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Taxes.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Multi-component interventions.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Salt intake outcomes with interventions detailed in other publications.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Modelling studies included in the systematic review.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Fig 1.

Interventions classified on the upstream / downstream continuum.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

PRISMA flowchart.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Effectiveness of interventions to reduce salt intake (empirical studies).

Forest plot of the empirical studies that were included in this systematic review. Negative values of salt reduction are interpreted as reported increase in salt consumption. For most combined interventions the sample size and confidence intervals were not reported. NA denotes not applicable or not reported.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Effectiveness of interventions to reduce salt intake (modelling studies).

Forest plot of the modelling studies that were included in this systematic review. Because of the different modelling approaches in these studies, their uncertainty measures are not comparable. Therefore we do not plot them in this graph. Different scenarios were considered for different studies. NA denotes not applicable or not reported.

More »

Fig 4 Expand