Fig 1.
Location of study region (Spencer Gulf, South Australia).
Table 1.
Description of marine habitats (risk units) assessed and number of survey responses per habitat.
Fig 2.
Risk assessment framework used to derive uncertainty and risk scores for each threat-habitat combination.
Table 2.
Top five threats for each habitat to Spencer Gulf based on perceived risk, effect scores and risk scores.
Fig 3.
Comparison of risk scores from expert elicitation survey within and between habitats.
Each point represents a risk score (most-likely scenario) for a threat-habitat combination and the grey horizontal line represents the mean of those risk scores.
Fig 4.
Comparison of risk level among threats, across all habitats.
Size and colour of the words are weighted according to the total risk score (the sum of all habitat specific scores) for each threat (i.e. the larger and redder word = greater threat).
Table 3.
Top-five threats for each habitat, ranked by the highest uncertainty scores (*).
‘Y’ indicates whether a threat-habitat combination also received a “top five” effect and/or risk score (see Table 2).