Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Estimates of condom effectiveness.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Description of scenarios used in condom investment case.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Annual coital frequency assumptions among risk groups used to estimate condom use.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Global current use and need for condoms for family planning and STI/HIV prevention, 2015 (billions), 81 countries.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 4.

Global estimates of current use, need, and gap in condoms for family planning, by region, 2015 (millions).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Global estimates of current use, need, and gap in condoms for HIV and STI prevention, among risk groups (2015) in millions of condoms.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Total cost of condoms for FP and HIV/STI prevention, by scenario, in billions $US, 2015–2030, 81 countries.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Incremental cost of condoms for FP and HIV/STI prevention, in millions, US$, 2015–2020, 2015–30, total and by region.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Condom effectiveness: Births averted and DALYs averted, by region (2015–2030).

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Condom effectiveness: HIV infections and DALYs averted, by region (2015–2030).

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Condom effectiveness: STI infections and DALYs averted, by region (2015–2030), medium and high scenarios.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Incremental cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratio of condoms, (2015–2030).

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Condom cost-effectiveness, on average for all condom investment framework countries, 2015–2030.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

Range of ICERs resulting from the sensitivity analysis, medium and high scenarios, 2015–2030.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Fig 2.

Cost-effectiveness of various HIV/STI/FP interventions, cost per DALY averted, $US 2015.

More »

Fig 2 Expand