Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

List of mathematical notations.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of some popular fuzzy co-clustering algorithms.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

The flowchart of the proposed algorithm.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Dataset details.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Clustering performance comparisons of FCM, FCCM, RFCC, FCCI and ibFCC in terms of F-Measure and entropy on the six subsets.

(a) F-Measure values of FCM, FCCM, RFCC, FCCI and ibFCC (b) Entropy values of FCM, FCCM, RFCC, FCCI and ibFCC.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Clustering performance comparisons of FCM, FCCM, RFCC, FCCI and ibFCC in terms of clustering score on the six subsets.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparisons of the five approaches on the 6 subsets in terms of p-value.

(a) Oh1(b) Oh2(c) LC(d) BT(e) Card(f) MPE.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Document clusters distribution for three subsets with less clusters.

(a) LC(b) Oh1(c) BT.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparison of our approaches and counterpart algorithms in terms of empty cluster number.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of our approach and counterpart algorithms in terms of running time (s).

More »

Table 4 Expand