Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Literature screening flow diagram.

From: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systemetic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097. For more information, visit www.prisma-statement.org.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Forest plot comparing the clinical pregnancy rate per woman randomized between the GnRH-ant group and the GnRH-a long-protocol group.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Forest plot comparing the ongoing pregnancy rate per woman randomized between the GnRH-ant group and the GnRH-a long-protocol group.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Forest plot comparing the live birth rate per woman randomized between the GnRH-ant group and the GnRH-a long-protocol group.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Forest plot comparing the number of stimulation days per woman randomized between the GnRH-ant group and the GnRH-a long-protocol group.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Forest plot comparing the Gn dosage per woman randomized between the GnRH-ant group and the GnRH-a long-protocol group.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Forest plot comparing the endometrial thickness on the day of HCG administration per woman randomized between the GnRH-ant group and the GnRH-a long-protocol group.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Forest plot comparing the E2 level on the day of HCG administration per woman randomized between the GnRH-ant group and the GnRH-a long-protocol group.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Forest plot comparing the number of oocytes retrieved per woman randomized between the GnRH-ant group and the GnRH-a long-protocol group.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Forest plot comparing the number of embryos obtained per woman randomized between the GnRH-ant group and the GnRH-a long-protocol group.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Forest plot comparing the incidence of OHSS per woman randomized between the GnRH-ant group and the GnRH-a long-protocol group.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Forest plot comparing the miscarriage rate per woman randomized between the GnRH-ant group and the GnRH-a long-protocol group.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Forest plot comparing the cycle cancellation rate per woman randomized between the GnRH-ant group and the GnRH-a long-protocol group.

More »

Fig 13 Expand