Fig 1.
Flowchart of mindfulness intervention group and control group.
*Linear mixed effects models use all available data and obtains valid inferences under the missing at random assumption.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of study participants.
Table 2.
Outcomes at baseline and 12 months, and linear mixed models-based estimated difference (β) of intervention group compared to control over time.
Fig 2.
Cohen’s D in intention-to-treat analysis.
Plot showing Cohen’s D effect measures of online mindfulness compared to treatment as usual in the Intention-To-Treat analysis. All values lower than 0 indicate a significant difference in favour of mindfulness. The breadth of the line indicates the 95%CI. Values between 0 and -0.2 indicate negligible effect; between -0.2 and -0.5 small effect; between -0.5 and -0.8 medium effect and lower than -0.8 a large effect. *: log transformed values.
Fig 3.
Cohen’s D in as-treated analysis.
Plot showing Cohen’s D effect measures of online mindfulness compared to treatment as usual in the As-Treated analysis. All values lower than 0 indicate a significant difference in favour of mindfulness. The breadth of the line indicates the 95%CI. Values between 0 and -0.2 indicate negligible effect; between -0.2 and -0.5 small effect; between -0.5 and -0.8 medium effect and lower than -0.8 a large effect. *: log transformed values.
Fig 4.
Plot showing Linear Mixed Models results: the mean distance walked in meters by the Intervention group (red) and the Control group (blue) at each of the three measurement moments.