Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Representation of the steps executed by the algorithm.

Representation of the steps executed by the algorithm applied to a 3D reconstruction of a HR-pQCT image of an MCP joint. Based on the outer margin contour of the original bone structure (a.) a solid volume is created (b.). The outer shell of this volume is segmented and depicted in red (c.) using an erosion operation. This is the cortical mask (d.), which is used to identify the cortical bone (e.). This cortical bone is dilated to fill small cavities (f.). Next, the image is inverted (g.) and only interruptions that were connected to the endosteal and periosteal boundary are selected (h.). The remaining cortical interruptions are dilated to their original volume (i.) and the results can be visually inspected by adding a transparent cortical mask (j.).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

2D examples of cortical interruptions on voxel level that are detected and are not detected by the algorithm.

2D examples of cortical interruptions on voxel level that are detected (I-III) and are not detected (IV-VI) by the algorithm. The following steps are made by the algorithm: The original cortex (step a, depicted in black) is dilated with 1 voxel (step b, depicted in grey). The cortex is then inverted (step c), only interruptions that are connected with the endosteal and periosteal boundary are selected and dilated to (approximately) its original size. The interruptions that are detected are subsequently displayed in the cortex (green) (d). Interruptions that are not connected to both the endosteal and periosteal boundary (IV-VI) with at least 3 pixels are not detected by the algorithm.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Examples of the 2D and 3D outputs of the algorithm.

Typical examples of a 3D reconstruction of an MCP joint for a HC (I), a patient with early RA (<2 years since diagnosis) (II), and a patient with late RA (>10 years since diagnosis) (III), with the corresponding 3D outputs of the algorithm. The cortical region is indicated in transparent white. Cortical interruptions of ≥0.246mm that are detected by the algorithm are shown in green. b) Corresponding 2D grayscale images with in green cortical interruptions detected by the algorithm.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Examples of contours that were manually corrected.

Typical examples of 2D grayscale images in which the contour is manually corrected by the operators. In a) a large cortical interruption is shown (a. I, arrow). The automatically obtained contour does not follow the outer margin of the original structure at the cortical interruption (a. II). The operators therefore corrected the contour (a. III) to accurately detect the large cortical interruption (IV). In b) a small motion artifact is shown (I). Due to this motion artifact, the automatically obtained contour was not tight around its original structure (II). The operators corrected this (III) and therefore no interruption was detected (IV).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

The number of cortical interruptions and interruption surface per joint detected by the algorithm and with visual scoring.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Reliability of the algorithm.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

2D examples of interruptions detected visually, and with the algorithm.

Typical examples of a 2D grayscale images of interruptions detected visually (a), and with the algorithm (b). (I.) Shows an interruption detected visually (white arrow) as well as with the algorithm (green circle). (II.) Shows interuptions detected by the algorithm which were not detected visually (orange arrows). Small cortical interruptions could be observed, but not meeting the criteria of a cortical interruption in the visual scoring (II.). (III.) Shows a small interruption that was detected visually (white arrow), but not with the algorithm.

More »

Fig 5 Expand