Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The integration and expression of MoHrip1 and MoHrip2 in rice.

Different transgenic rice lines were chosen for molecular detection. (A). Schematic representation of the T-DNA region of pCXUN containing MoHrip1/MoHrip2-encoding genes. (B). Southern blotting of T1 transgenic rice. The numbers (1–13) represent MoHrip1-5, MoHrip1-9, MoHrip1-1, MoHrip1::HA-2, MoHrip1::HA-5, MoHrip1::HA-3, MoHrip1::HA-1, MoHrip2-5, MoHrip2-8, MoHrip2- 4, MoHrip2::HA-8, MoHrip2::HA-4, and MoHrip2::HA-4, respectively. M: DL15000 Marker. (C). Northern blotting of T2 transgenic rice. The numbers (1–8) represent MoHrip1-5, MoHrip1::HA-3, MoHrip1::HA-5, MoHrip1::HA-1, MoHrip2-8, MoHrip2-5, MoHrip2::HA-4, and MoHrip2::HA -8, respectively. The loading controls were 18S RNA and 28S rRNA. (D). Western blotting of the T2 transgenic rice. pCXUN was used as a negative control. (d1) The numbers (1–3) represent the empty vector pCXUN, MoHrip1::HA-1, MoHrip1::HA-5, respectively, and numbers 4 and 5 represent MoHrip1-5; (d2) The numbers (1–3) represent pCXUN, MoHrip2::HA -4, MoHrip2::HA -8, respectively, and the numbers 4 and 5 represent MoHrip2-5. All samples verified the expression of MoHrip1 and MoHrip2 in transgenic rice.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Primers used in this study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Disease symptoms on the leaves of MoHrip1, MoHrip2, pCXUN, and WT rice.

The detached leaves of two-week-old rice seedlings were sprayed with M. oryzae spores. The lowercase letters (a-f) represent MoHrip1-5 MoHrip1::HA-1, MoHrip1::HA-5 MoHrip2-5, MoHrip2::HA -4, and MoHrip2::HA -8, respectively. Representative leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. The results were obtained from three independent experiments.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The Trypan blue staining of leaves challenged with M. oryzae spores.

The 2- and 6-dpi leaves were stained with Trypan blue solution to observe the development of disease symptoms at the inoculation sites. The arrows indicate the hyphae (2 dpi: bars = 100 μm; 6 dpi: bars = 50 μm).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Disease severity of rice blast in leaves of transgenic rice.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

The expression levels of defense-related genes in rice.

The WT, pCXUN, MoHrip1 and MoHrip2 rice were inoculated with blast suspension spores (2×105). At the indicated times, leaves were collected from these rice plants and measured via qRT-PCR. The relative expression of pathogenesis-related genes OsPR-1a (A) and OsPR-10a (B); SA signal-related genes OsEDS1 (C), OsNH1 (D), and OsPAL1 (E); and JA/ET biosynthesis-related genes OsLOX2 (F) and OsAOS2 (G) are shown. dpi: days post-inoculation; Error bars represent mean ± SD. Essentially identical results were obtained across three independent experiments. The asterisks indicate significant differences from the WT rice (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01)

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The phenotype and ABA content of drought-stressed rice.

The MoHrip1-5 and MoHrip2-5 transgenic plants (line 5 of each transgenic plant) as well as the pCXUN rice and WT rice were well-watered for 2 weeks, and then water was discontinued for 16 days. The phenotype of rice before drought and after drought (A). The ABA content of transgenic and control rice on the 0 d, 6 d, 10 d, 14 d, and 16 d of drought stress (B). Essentially identical results were obtained across three independent experiments.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The physiological indices of drought-stressed rice.

Analysis of RWC (A), WLR (B), WUE (C), and the chlorophyll content (D) in WT, pCXUN and transgenic rice under normal condition and after 14 d of drought stress. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of three replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences from the WT rice (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The expression levels of ABA-related genes in rice under drought-stress treatment.

RNA samples were prepared from rice leaves collected on the 0 d, 6 d, 10 d, 14 d, and 16 d of drought stress. The relative expression of OsNCED2 (A), OsNCED3 (B), OsZEP1 (C), and OsbZIP23 (D) is shown. Error bars represent mean ± SD. Essentially identical results were obtained across three independent experiments. The asterisks indicate significant differences from the WT rice (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01)

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 3.

Improved agronomic traits in transgenic rice expressing MoHrip1 or MoHrip2.

More »

Table 3 Expand