Table 1.
Measured and imputed undernutrition prevalence, 2014.
Fig 1.
Standard errors of underweight and stunting prevalence, and number of children in woredas.
Table 2.
OLS regression of z-scores.
Fig 2.
Variation in share of children stunted and underweight across woredas in each regions.
The bar in center of box is the median stunted and underweight prevalence across woredas in each region. The box is the 25th and 75 percentile; dots are outside values.
Fig 3.
Share of children underweight in each woreda.
The figure shows share of children underweight.
Fig 4.
Share of children stunted in each woreda.
The figure shows share of children stunted.
Fig 5.
Number of children underweight in each woreda.
The figure shows the number of underweight children. Each dot represent 100 underweight children.
Fig 6.
Number of children stunted in each woreda.
The figure shows the number of stunted children. Each dot represent 100 stunted children.
Fig 7.
Share and number of underweight children in each woreda.
The figure shows the number of underweight children by the height of the column and the share of children underweight by the color of each woreda. The color scale is the same as in Fig 3.
Fig 8.
Share and number of stunted children in each woreda.
The figure shows the number of stunted children by the height of the column and the share of children stunted by the color of each woreda. The color scale is the same as in Fig 4.
Fig 9.
Concentration of underweight children (number of underweight children per km2).
The figure shows the number of underweight children per km2 in each woreda.
Fig 10.
Concentration of stunted children (number of stunted children per km2).
The figure shows the number of stunted children per km2 in each woreda.
Fig 11.
Spatial correlation between share, number and concentration of underweight children.
Fig 12.
Spatial correlation between share, number and concentration of stunted children.
Fig 13.
Location of underweight and stunted children.