Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Inclusion scheme and study design from baseline to T1.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

The Person-Centred Handover (PCH) model, description of the five components.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Clinical variables for all responding patients from the different wards at T0 and T1 respectively.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Mean scale scores for EORTC IN-PATSAT32 over wards and T0 and T1 respectively.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Mean scores of the EORTC INPATSAT-32.

(A) shows the mean scores for the intervention ward and the compiled control wards at baseline. (B) shows the mean scores for the compiled control wards at baseline and T1. (C) shows the mean scores for the intervention ward at baseline and T1. (D) shows the mean scores for the intervention ward and the compiled control wards at T1. IN-PATSAT32 scales: ACC = access, COM = comfort, DAV = doctors’ availability, DIP = doctors’ information provision, DIS = doctors’ interpersonal skills, DTS = doctors’ technical skills, EXE = exchange of information between caregivers, GEN = overall quality rating, NAV = nurses’ availability, NIP = nurses’ information provision, NIS = nurses’ interpersonal skills, NTS = nurses’ technical skills, OTH = other personal interpersonal skills and information provision, WAI = waiting time.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

(A) shows the EORTC INPATSAT-32 scores at baseline adjusted for age, sex, education and treatment intention in a multivariate regression analysis. (B) shows the EORTC INPATSAT-32 scores at T1 adjusted for age, sex, education and treatment intention in a multivariate regression analysis.

More »

Fig 3 Expand