Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Loci targeted for PCR using sourced primers.

Forward (-F) and reverse (-R) primer directions indicated by suffix. Original primer sequences modified by addition of 17 bp vector M-13 5´ tails (tail sequences not shown here, refer to Materials and methods).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Maximum percent intraspecific distance (Dintra), and percent distance to nearest genetic neighbour species for six loci across five invasive and seven native grass species.

A: atpF; B: psbE; C: matK; D: ETS; E: ndhK; F: ITS.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

PCR success rate of each locus against each species tested (Invasive grasses are indicated with *).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Information used to evaluate the utility of the six loci.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Percent distance of maximum percent intraspecific distance (Dintra) and nearest genetic neighbour species (DNN) across five invasive and seven native grass species (N/A: not available for single specimen).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

NJ trees inferred from six loci.

A: atpF, B: psbE, C: matK, D: ETS, E: ndhK, F: ITS. Bootstrap support > 70% (N = 1000 replications) for clusters as reported. Scale bars indicate proportion of differences under a K2P model.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

ML trees inferred from six loci.

A: atpF, B: psbE, C: matK, D: ETS, E: ndhK, F: ITS. Bootstrap supports > 70% (N = 1000 replications) for clades as reported. Scale bars report proportion of differences under a GTR model.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 5.

Overview of the multiple loci combinations analyses.

More »

Table 5 Expand