Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Population data: Census units versus grid.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Maps showing distribution of the Hispanic population in central Chicago according to Census tracts (panel A for 2000 and panel B for 2010) and according to high resolution grids (panel D for 2000 and panel E for 2010).

Census tracts boundaries are overlaid on grid-based maps for reference. Extent of the ZIP Code is shown in blue. Inset in panel E is to show the high (30m) resolution of the grid. Racial diversity grid-based map (D) shows spatial extents of two communities, Blacks-dominated (green color) and Hispanic-dominated (violet color).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Classification of population into 39 different communities based on degree of diversity, dominant race, and population density.

Colors serve as a legend to the diversity maps (see Fig 3), numbers are numerical labels as encoded in diversity data downloadable from SocScape.)

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Availability of grid population data.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Racial diversity maps of the Chicago area for 1990, 2000, and 2010.

The upper row shows maps for the greater Chicago area and the lower row shows maps for the central Chicago area indicated by a red rectangle on the broader extent map for 1990. Major roads are overlaid for geographical reference. For the legend of community categories see Fig 2, the white color indicates uninhabited areas.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Summary of landscape metrics.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Landscape level metrics for the Chicago site.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Community level metrics for the Chicago site.

More »

Table 5 Expand