Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics for women in group with and without fetal anomaly at inclusion (T1).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Psychometric scores in women with and without a fetal anomaly, assessed at four points in pregnancy.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Comparison of maternal psychological distress during pregnancy with and without a fetal anomaly.

The figure presents psychological distress in women in the study group (with fetal anomaly) and comparison group (normal ultrasound findings) at the four assessments, as measured by the Intrusion subscale of the Impact of Event Scale (IES). Box-and-whiskers plots show 50% of cases (25–75 percentiles) in the rectangle, each of the whiskers represents the smallest and largest values. The line within the rectangle represents the median value.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Comparison of maternal psychological distress during pregnancy with and without a fetal anomaly.

The figure presents psychological distress in women in the study group (with fetal anomaly) and comparison group (normal ultrasound findings) at the four assessments, as measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Box-and-whiskers plots show 50% of cases (25–75 percentiles) in the rectangle, each of the whiskers represents the smallest and largest values. The line within the rectangle represents the median value.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Number of women with a score ≥ 3 on any of the IES items and ≥ 1 at any of the EPDS items at all four assessments.

High score were considered ≥ 3 for the IES and ≥ 1 for EPDS.

More »

Table 3 Expand