Table 1.
Farm characteristics.
Fig 1.
Prevalence of ESBL-E. coli-positive pooled samples from pigs per farm type.
Error bars indicate 95% CIs.
Table 2.
Prevalence of ESBL-E. coli in pooled pig samples within different age groups.
Table 3.
Distribution of ESBL genes in isolates from pooled pig samples.
Fig 2.
Antimicrobial use by type of farm during the 4 periods (≈6 months) before each sampling moment.
GM and 95% CI from log2 DDDA/Y. AMU, antimicrobial use. Error bars indicate 95% CIs.
Fig 3.
Proportions of antimicrobials used over the total DDDA/Y per farm type during the 4 periods (≈6 months) before each sampling moment.
DDDA/Y, defined daily dosages animal per year.
Table 4.
Univariate ORs for a pig farm to be ESBL-E. coli-positive.
Table 5.
Multivariate ORs for a pig farm to be ESBL-E. coli-positive (Model A) and for a pooled pig sample to be ESBL-E. coli-positive (Model B).