Fig 1.
(A) Structures of known tubulin inhibitors. (B) Superposition of the skeletal structure of target compounds 10a-m and SMART. All density functional theory calculations and geometry optimizations were performed using the Gaussian 09 software.
Table 1.
Molecular structures of compounds 10a-v.
Fig 2.
Reagents and conditions. (i) CS2, Et3N, Et2O, 25°C; (ii) I2, Et3N, EtOAc, 0°C; (iii) NH3·H2O; (iv) CuBr2, CHCl3, EtOAc; (v) EtOH, MW 80°C; (vi) 1) CH3I, DMF, 25°C or 2) Ac2O, 50°C.
Table 2.
Antiproliferative activity of compounds 10a-v, CA-4 (2), Nocodazole (3) and SMART (5).
Fig 3.
Effects of 10s on tubulin polymerization.
Tubulin was pre-incubated for 1 min with 10s at 2 μM, 10 μM, 25 μM and 50 μM, CA-4 at 0.5 μM, paclitaxel at 5 μM or vehicle DMSO (control) at room temperature before GTP was added to start the tubulin polymerization reactions. The reaction was monitored at 37°C.
Fig 4.
Immunostaining of tubulin assembly in SGC-7901 cells.
SGC-7901 cells were treated with 10s (0.72 μM) for 48 h. Tubulin assembly was stained with FITC (left panel) and DAPI (middle panel). A merge of the two panels is shown on the right. Images were taken using a confocal microscope.
Fig 5.
(A) 10s caused G2/M phase arrest in a concentration-dependent manner in SGC-7901 cells. Cells were treated with 10s (0.18, 0.36, 0.72 μM) for 24 h. (B) 10s and CA-4 induced G2/M phase arrest in a time-dependent manner. SGC-7901 cells were treated with 10s (0.72 μM) or CA-4 (0.05 μM) for 6, 12 and 24 h.
Fig 6.
(A). The binding mode of compound 10s (violet), 10u (cyan) and SMART (green) in the colchicine binding site of tubulin. (B).Overlay of 10s in the binding site. Hydrogen bonds are shown using green dashed lines and the distance is less than 3 Å. (C).Overlay of 10u in the binding site.
Fig 7.
We used a linear fitting curve to compare the predicted pIC50 values (modeled based on a known dataset of 21 defined compounds in SGC-7901 cells) with the experimental pIC50 values.
y = 0.992x + 0.007, R – square = 0.992.
Fig 8.
(A). 3D-QSAR model coefficients on electrostatic potential grids. Blue represents positive coefficients; red represents negative coefficients. (B). 3D-QSAR model coefficients on Van der Waals grids. Green represents positive coefficients; yellow represents negative coefficients. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)