Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Disfluency type schema.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Group summary statistics.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Number of disfluencies by type and group.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Results for regression on content mazes versus fillers.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 1.

Percent of mazes which are content mazes (versus fillers).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 5.

Results for regression on repetitions versus revisions.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 2.

Percent of content mazes which are repetitions (versus revisions).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 6.

Results for regression on false starts versus repetitions and revisions.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 3.

Percent of content mazes which are false starts (versus repetitions and revisions).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 7.

Results for regression on cued versus non-cued content mazes.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 4.

Percent of content mazes which are cued by a filler (versus content mazes which are not cued).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 8.

Results for exploratory analysis of content versus non-content mazes.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Results for exploratory analysis of cued (versus non-cued) content mazes.

More »

Table 9 Expand